Jim vs. Power Cleans & Front Squats, and a “Metabolic Finisher”

And by “Metabolic Finisher”, I mean “a metcon I’d classify as ‘Nasty, Brutish, and Short’.” Judd sent some of them my way, and they rocked enough that I figured I’d not only do some of them, but I’d use the author’s terminology at least once.

But they’re seriously metcons. Anyway!

Power clean + front squat x 2
110
120
130
140
150
160
170

Haven’t done this in a while, but 170 is my Pr on the clean and jerk, so I’m happy with how this went down. Got ugly at the end, admittedly, but I did it.

Then, the finisher.

AMRAP in 3 minutes of:
KB snatches x 3 (each hand)
Goblet squats x 3
Close-grip decline push-ups x 3

Used a 35lb dumbbell for this, and got through four full rounds plus the snatches and squats of a fifth. Would’ve moved faster, but transitioning between movements took even longer than expected.

About these ads

2 Responses to Jim vs. Power Cleans & Front Squats, and a “Metabolic Finisher”

  1. My main worry about that little metcon/finisher is that the transitions would take up more time than the actual work.

    • It was definitely an issue. Oddly, I think moving from the snatches to the goblet squats took at least as much time as moving to and from the push-ups. That could’ve just been my unfamiliarity with doing goblet squats with a dumbbell.

      Of course, if you’re really pushing the metabolic aspect of things, I’m not sure the decline is necessary on the push-ups, and that’ll save you a good chunk of time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s